Start blogging by creating a new post. You can edit or delete me by clicking under the comments. You can also customize your sidebar by dragging in elements from the top bar.
62 Comments
Gabriel Arthur Petrie
2/14/2012 09:05:38 pm
I'm so glad you came back online! I had a copy of your old website presentation, with the really beautifully presented graphic laying out the interactions of all of these physical laws and how your theory places them in the context of gyroscopic force. Is that illustration going to be in your book? It looked sort of like a panel from Star Trek or something, it was very sleek.
Reply
2/23/2012 11:20:30 pm
Gabriel
Reply
Steve Wilson
3/26/2012 06:59:43 am
Hello Willie, I am comforted by your GFT and also believe you are on the right track, I don't profess to understand everything you have written, but would very much like to buy your book and ask a few theoretical questions if i may, if Gyroscopic Force did exist, and was able to impart a thrust on to orbital particles thus giving them an artificial mass would this explain the Higgs Boson field effect? and if the imparted force/thrust was equal & opposite there would be no loss of energy, would that scenario calculate out to be an acceptable equation in the standard model?
Reply
4/3/2012 10:01:00 pm
Steve
Reply
4/4/2012 02:46:04 am
Comparing and contrasting tenants of the GFT and the Standard model become a bit tricky. I have tried to maintain some of the same terminology in terms of particles as the standard model, but quite frankly, they may or may not be equivalent. 7/17/2012 02:57:04 pm
I dont think Ive seen all of the angles of this topic the way youve pointed them out. Youre a true star, a rock star man. Youve got so significantly to say and know so much about the subject that I believe you must just teach a class about it
Reply
Michael Stallings
10/30/2012 03:52:47 am
I am glad to see you are back on the web and still continuing your work. In Chapter 26 (the only chapter I have been able to find) you state: "Indeed, the GFT posits that electric induction can occur if and only if electron precession is executed." This being so, is there a means to inudce current without convnetional methods of changing a magnetic field?
Reply
Willie Johnson
11/4/2012 04:49:30 am
In the original Word formatted form of the book I had this short chapter but decided to not include it in the latest publication. My Law of Dimensions would indicate that precession, is precession, is precession no matter the source so theoretically this should work. The figure, which will not print here, simply shows a precessing disc with current being drawn from the edge.
Reply
Willie Johnson
11/4/2012 11:17:17 pm
Michael
Reply
Willie Johnson Jr.
11/4/2012 11:26:51 pm
You know it just occurred to me. If gravity induces precession and precession induces a current and a current induces a magnetic field then it must be the case that the earth's magnetic field is due to the gravitational precession of the earth around the sun.
Reply
Michael Stallings
11/6/2012 05:05:56 am
Interesting deduction. That would apply to other orbiting bodies as well. Earth also has a conductive ocean.
Reply
Willie Johnson Jr.
11/6/2012 05:41:08 am
Again. It is not so much what other forces causes precession. The law of dimensions says that force, is force, is force. Doesn't matter what type. It only matters their orientation.
Reply
Michael Stallings
11/6/2012 10:31:50 pm
So, any two orthogonal forces that act on electrons should induce a current. This reminds me of the "guiding center" page on wikipedea which shows orthogonal forces resulting in electron drift.
Reply
Willie Johnson Jr.
11/7/2012 02:05:59 am
It is true that the electrons in a conductor are not entirely free to move. But by precessing the conductor you necessarily precess the electrons contained within thus, theoretically, you should induce a current.
Reply
Michael Stallings
11/7/2012 09:22:16 am
Great response! You explained induction very well.
Reply
Michael Stallings
11/8/2012 12:01:38 am
How does electron precession occur during conduction?
Reply
Willie Johnson Jr.
11/8/2012 02:53:02 am
How does electron precession occur during conduction?
Reply
Michael Stallings
11/9/2012 03:58:36 am
Is there a way to simulate the movement required for induction, or to move "space" relative to the conductor/force?
Reply
Willie Johnson Jr.
11/9/2012 05:24:58 am
“Moving space”. That’s an interesting concept. I don’t know if this addresses what you mean but if we can think of ”moving space” as expanding , or shrinking space then perhaps. Let’s go back to that equation in the previous post Er= (B/t)x(qrr)= V. The more common expression of this equation is emf=vBl . You can find an explanation of this in any standard text book on induction and motional emf. Now generally it is stated that given emf=vBl , the magnitude of the induced emf can be increased by increasing the strength of the magnetic field, moving the bar faster, or using a longer bar where l represents the length of the bar. But let’s look at this dimensionally. Dimensionally we would have emf=(rBl)/t. Since both l and r are lengths we would have then have emf=(rrB)/t=(AB)/t where A=area. Notice that in this arrangement we are free to vary either the magnetic field or the area through which it passes. Thus through a dimensional determination we can say the magnitude of the induced emf can be increased by increasing the strength of the magnetic field or increasing the area through which it passes. So if we “move space” by expanding the area then we can induce a current. But this is wholly equivalent to changing the magnetic flux (by changing the area) or moving a conductor (the bar) in a magnetic field. It’s all equivalent as it must be.
Reply
Michael Stallings
11/12/2012 11:16:43 am
How about "other" means of inducing current? We established above that two orthogonal forces and relative motion or change induce current.
Reply
Michael Stallings
1/9/2013 01:59:48 am
You stated above:
Reply
Willie Johnson Jr.
5/21/2013 12:54:21 am
I have just made the book available to the general public at cost for a limited time. I will not make a penny from this initial offering. It goes straight to Lulu. It just isn't practical to list chapters and several pages on the site. The book would be a much better source.
Reply
3/13/2013 10:13:17 am
Reply
3/30/2013 03:28:56 am
I have been functioning with pcs for yrs, but I usually search on the net to see if there are any sources readily available to me.|A different element you have to have to contemplate no matter whether you can manage the value which charged from you.
Reply
3/30/2013 10:33:17 pm
You could certainly see your skills in the paintings you write. The world hopes for more passionate writers like you who aren't afraid to mention how they believe. All the time go after your heart.
Reply
Willie Johnson Jr.
5/21/2013 12:46:21 am
Thank you for the kind sentiments
Reply
Willie Johnson Jr.
5/21/2013 12:59:53 am
To my gracious readers:
Reply
Michael Stallings
9/23/2013 07:24:17 am
In the abridged copy of your book, you list equations for induction of electric current, one of which is: ExB=qr/t
Reply
Willie Johnson Jr.
9/24/2013 10:06:04 am
Just curious. Did you purchase a copy?
Reply
Michael Stallings
9/26/2013 03:12:37 am
Yes, I purchased the b/w abridged version, and hope to purchase the color version later this year. I'll take a look at chapter 25.12
Reply
Willie Johnson
9/26/2013 05:32:57 am
Thank you Michael for both the purchase and the kind words. Lulu offers coupons monthly anywhere from 10 to 20 percent off so if you do decide to purchase the color edition try and use one of the coupons to defray the cost. The color illustrations really shine in the chapter dealing with the creation of the periodic chart, and particle structure. The b/w illustrations just do no do them justice.
Michael Stallings
9/28/2013 02:59:37 am
Looking at page 364, section 25.12 of the abridged version, you describe that the E field is regarded as the moving centrode and B as the fixed space centrode. Then you explain that even though qr may have zero velocity and though E may be fixed, qr is still effectively transferred from one location on the space centrode to the other, provided E and B are circular.
Reply
Willie Johnson
9/28/2013 09:42:37 am
Michael,
Reply
Willie Johnson
9/28/2013 09:47:42 am
Michael
Reply
Michael Stallings
9/28/2013 01:46:51 pm
I remember Dirac's comments on the Poynting Vector and how energy flowed out of the source, and into the load, making no sense what so ever, and it doesn't tell you "how" it occurs.
Reply
Willie Johnson
10/2/2013 07:06:23 am
Tesla and Maxwell and Faraday believed in the aether, Einstein space-time, modern contemporary scientists will laugh and ridicule the concept of an aether (bad science and crackpot theory) but they doggedly promote zero point energy and virtual particles. It's actually pretty amusing especially since Tesla quite clearly and definitively proved the existence of an aether or rather the existence of electrostatic impulses that permeate space. Bottom line; nobody believes in a completely empty space. Even Einstein gave this empty space physical characteristics.
Reply
Willie Johnson
9/30/2013 07:46:02 am
I really can't speak to that. I'm sure there are several that will suit your purpose for the right fee or use a free site like Weebly.
Reply
Michael Stallings
10/2/2013 01:51:56 am
What are the units for qr?
Reply
Willie Johnson
10/2/2013 05:59:13 am
coulomb meter
Reply
Michael Stallings
10/2/2013 09:13:46 am
coulumb-meter ?
Reply
Willie Johnson
10/5/2013 12:33:42 pm
You bring up, once again some excellent points. I didn’t realize that qr was the electric dipole moment. That however clears up a lot of things and we can make predictions (assumptions) based on the dimensional analysis. Note that in chapter 9.2 I explain the mechanism of gravitation and its reactionary force, inertia, via Ida’s law where V=uB cos theta. In this case u is the magnetic dipole moment and must therefore have units of qvr since V=Er and E=qvB. I do however recall the electric and magnetic dipole moments as having the following characteristics: A static electric dipole subjected to an applied electric field will precess about that field. The same is almost true for a magnetic dipole, i.e., a moving charge subjected to a perpendicularly applied magnetic field will precess about that field. Note that all charges behave as if they are miniature bar magnets thus their magnetic polarity and thus their dipole (magnetic) nature. Both follow similar rules. For the electric dipole torque =uxE cos theta=qrxE cos theta. For the magnetic dipole torque=uxB sin theta=qrvxB sin theta. Note that in the electric dipole case qr is static but in the magnetic dipole case qr has a velocity,v, i.e., it moves. So what qr is and how it behaves has been clarified, and the excellent chapters you provided on the subject can be easily (well, justifiably) applied to the subject. (the site Hyperphysics makes the reading a lot more clearer if you start with their explanations and definitions first)
Reply
Willie Johnson
10/6/2013 10:48:14 am
I played around with the tExB=qr induction equation dimensionally some more. Note: tE=tF/q=F/i or force per current.
Michael Stallings
10/7/2013 02:02:49 pm
Yes, the old GFT Homopolar chapter (was it 29?) is how I found your work a few years ago.
Reply
Michael Stallings
10/8/2013 02:42:57 am
On a separate note, moving objects might cause detectable changes in the space around them that could be detected. However, I have no idea how the changes might manifest or how to detect them.
Reply
Willie Johnson Jr.
10/9/2013 09:36:06 am
Sounds like the Michelson-Morley experiment.
Reply
Michael Stallings
10/16/2013 01:09:12 am
Do you have any suggestion for experimentation with GFT Induction?
Reply
Michael Stallings
10/30/2013 04:39:32 am
I don't have the book with me, but I think it contained an explanation of what other perceive as dark matter.
Reply
Willie Johnson Jr.
6/7/2014 11:38:20 am
Michael
Reply
Willie Johnson Jr.
6/7/2014 11:43:34 am
Michael',
Reply
Willie Johnson Jr.
6/8/2014 02:22:31 am
Indeed that 3rd force is Newton’s gravitational force law and once again I demonstrate in the book how Newton’s gravitational force constant, G, can be expressed in terms of Coulomb’s constant and how Newton’s gravitation force law is equivalent to Coulomb’s
Reply
Willie Johnson Jr.
6/7/2014 11:50:26 am
Michael
Reply
Michael Stallings
7/10/2014 12:47:17 pm
Hello Willie,
Reply
Michael Stallings
7/10/2014 12:46:36 pm
Hello Willie,
Reply
Willie Johnson Jr.
7/15/2014 01:00:44 pm
Thanks Mike. When it comes to overunity there seems to be two extreme camps . There is a middle ground. I personally do not think there is overunity. Just unity. However, I think mainstream science is only playing with half the deck. There is another side to electromagnetism (scalar) that gets completely ignored. So I do believe we can take advantage of the scalar nature of electromagnetism. This isn't wishful thinking or crackpottery. Tesla demonstrated experimentally and Steinmetz described it mathematically. Of course so did Maxwell but nobody could understand that portion of his work. Steinmetz uses versors which just reconfirms my use of quaternions. In addition to that we can just make machines more efficient.
Reply
Michael Stallings
7/16/2014 12:33:49 am
Any help along the lines of increased efficiency and taking advantage of the scalar nature of electromagnetism is welcomed.
Reply
Jimster41
5/8/2015 02:37:59 am
I found your website via google after a couple of bad experience just asking if you can see a double helix in the diagram on the wiki page on Euler's Formula. The reaction is "total coincidence" which is a strange concept, and clearly hard to apply to this case IMHO.I am now curious about how energy conservation, hierarchical periodicity and discrete scale in-variance are implied in this observation - which also, happens to help me understand what the heck e^i "does" in a way I will not soon forget.
Reply
Willie Johnson
10/18/2016 08:05:12 am
Jimster41
Reply
2/16/2018 01:32:22 pm
WEBSITE LOCATED USING BRUTE FORCE
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Willie Johnson Jr.ArchivesCategories |
- Introduction
- The Eight Articles of Unification
- Unification
-
Tovacian Chemistry
- DefiningTovacian Chemistry
- Quaternions and Dimensional Analysis
- Rules and Principles of Tovacian Chemistry
- Deriving the Elementary Particle masses
- The Fractional Janet Left Step Periodic Chart
- Forming Double Helix DNA From Euler's Formula
- Solution to Goldbach's Conjecture
- Solution to Fermat's Conjecture
- Solution to the Riemann Hypothesis and Other Conjectures
- Wave/Particle Duality
- Discuss